Mitochondrial fusion protein MFN2 interacts with the mitostatin-related protein MNS1 required for mouse sperm flagellar structure and function
© Vadnais et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 7 March 2014
Accepted: 13 May 2014
Published: 29 May 2014
Cilia and the sperm flagellum share many structural properties. Meiosis-specific nuclear structural 1 (MNS1) is a recently characterized protein that is abundantly expressed in post-meiotic spermatids and is required for proper flagellar and motile cilia formation. To explore the possible functions of MNS1, we performed a BLAST search and determined it is homologous to the conserved domain pfam13868, exemplified by mitostatin. This protein interacts with mitofusin 2 (MFN2), a protein that participates in regulating mitochondrial associations to subcellular organelles. We hypothesized that an association between MFN2 and MNS1 in the sperm is involved in flagellar biogenesis and function.
In the studies reported here, MFN2 was found in murine reproductive and somatic tissues high in ciliary content while MNS1 was present as two closely migrating bands in reproductive tissues. Interestingly, mitostatin was also present in reproductive tissues. Similar to Mns1 and mitostatin, Mfn2 was expressed in the testis as detected by RT-PCR. In addition, Mfn2 and Mns1 decreased in expression from pachytene spermatocytes to condensing spermatids as assessed by quantitative RT-PCR. Co-immunoprecipitation demonstrated an association between MFN2 and MNS1 in spermatogenic cells. Indirect immunofluorescence indicated that MFN2 and MNS1 co-localized to the sperm flagellum in freshly collected cauda epididymal sperm. MFN2 associated with the midpiece while MNS1 was present throughout the sperm tail in caput and cauda epididymal sperm. In spermatogenic cells, MFN2 was seen in the mitochondria, and MNS1 was present throughout the cell cytoplasm. MFN2 and MNS1 were present in detergent-resistant flagellar structures of the sperm.
These results demonstrate that MFN2 and MNS1 are present in spermatogenic cells and are an integral part of the sperm flagellum, indicating they play a role in flagellar biogenesis and/or function.
KeywordsMFN2 MNS1 Mitostatin Sperm Flagella Axoneme Mitochondria
A recently characterized flagellar protein, meiosis-specific nuclear structural 1 (MNS1), is abundantly expressed in post-meiotic spermatids and is required for proper flagellar formation and function . Male mice deficient in MNS1 display decreased sperm production and are sterile because their sperm are immotile. The microtubules and ODFs of the flagella are disrupted, resulting in abnormal, short sperm tails. Similarly, the motile cilia of the trachea of MNS1-null males exhibit defects in the outer dynein arms of their axonemes. Based upon the extensive homology to proteins that comprise axonemal structures in a wide variety of organisms from Chlamydomonas to mammals, we postulate that mutations in MNS1 or associated proteins contribute to male infertility and/or ciliopathies in humans.
To elucidate a mechanism involving MNS1 and to discover candidates for associating proteins, we performed a BLAST search of the Conserved Domain Database . We identified a domain structure, pfam13868, which is characterized by mitostatin (also referred to as trichoplein and keratin filament binding protein), a protein that prevents cilia formation during the cell cycle and promotes their assembly during quiescence [3–5]. In somatic cells, outer dense fiber protein 2 (ODF2) recruits mitostatin, which, in turn, enlists ninein. In addition, mitostatin is involved in regulating mitochondrial-ER binding via mitofusin 2 (MFN2) . In mitochondria, MFN2 is an outer membrane protein that participates in the fusion, maintenance, and operation of the mitochondrial network . Although not well described in sperm, MFN2 has been localized to the flagellum in boar sperm [8, 9].
While MNS1 is critical for male fertility, its physiological functions and molecular mechanisms of interactions remain unknown. From the structural similarity of MNS1 to mitostatin, we can envision how this protein may function during spermatogenesis and in sperm. We hypothesize that MNS1 participates in a complex with MFN2 and ODF2 to anchor the mitochondria to the midpiece. In this investigation, we show that MFN2 is present in spermatogenic cells and epididymal sperm and, like MNS1, associates with the sperm flagellum. These studies are the first to report that MNS1 co-immunoprecipitated with MFN2 and that these proteins co-localized to the sperm flagellum.
Spermatogenic cell isolation
All animal procedures were approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and ethical guidelines were in accordance with the National Research Council’s publication Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching, Federation of Animal Science Societies, First Revised Edition, 1999. Mixed germ cells were prepared from decapsulated testes of adult male mice (C57BL/6 retired breeders; Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA, USA) by sequential dissociation with collagenase and trypsin-DNase I . In some cases, spermatogenic cells were isolated from ‘Red-Green’ mice (B6D2F1-Tg(CAG/su9-DsRed2, Acr3-EGFP)RBGS002Osb) which express green fluorescent protein (GFP) in the acrosome precursors of spermatogenic cell and red fluorescent protein (RFP) in mitochondria of all cells . To purify populations of pachytene spermatocytes, round spermatids, and condensing spermatids, the mixed germ cells were separated at unit gravity in a gradient of 2% to 4% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in Eagle’s Essential Medium with Earle’s Salts [12, 13]. Both the pachytene spermatocyte and round spermatid populations were at least 85% pure as determined by microscopic examination and differential counting with a hemocytometer; whereas, the condensing spermatid population was approximately 40% to 50% pure, with the balance primarily being anucleate residual bodies and round spermatids.
Purification of caput and cauda epididymal sperm
Sperm were collected from the caput and cauda epididymides of male mice (C57BL/6 retired breeders; Charles River Laboratories) by cutting the epididymides and extruding the sperm at 37°C into phosphate-buffered saline (PBS: 2.68 mM KCl, 136.09 mM NaCl, 1.47 mM KH2PO4, 8.07 mM Na2HPO4, pH 7.4 containing protease inhibitors (Roche, San Francisco, CA, USA)). Caput epididymal sperm were purified by centrifugation at 400 × g for 20 min at room temperature through a 35% PureSperm 100 solution (MidAtlantic Diagnostics, Mt. Laurel, NJ, USA) in PBS. Purified sperm were collected from the pellet, resuspended in PBS at 4°C, counted, and assessed for purity. Cauda epididymal sperm were collected by centrifugation at 800 × g for 5 min at room temperature, resuspended in PBS at 4°C, and counted.
Incubation of sperm in epididymis-like, non-capacitating, or capacitating conditions
Cauda epididymal sperm were collected and incubated in a physiological solution that mimicked epididymal luminal fluid  or were collected and incubated under non-capacitating or capacitating conditions . To simulate the epididymal lumen environment, sperm were allowed to swim out from the caudae epididymides into 2 mL of physiological solution that mimicked epididymal luminal fluid (50 mM NaCl, 50 mM potassium gluconate, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 0.6 mM CaCl2, 4 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM trisodium citrate, 6.4 mM NaH2PO4, and 3.6 mM Na2HPO4 then adjusted to pH 6.8 and approximately 350 to 360 mOsmol/kg H2O with raffinose at 37°C. For non-capacitating or capacitating conditions, sperm were allowed to swim out from the caudae epididymides into 2 mL modified Whitten medium (MW: 15 mM HEPES, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1 mM pyruvic acid, 4.8 mM lactic acid hemi-calcium salt, 5.5 mM glucose, pH 7.35) at 37°C. Epididymal tissue was removed, and the sperm were washed at 100 × g for 1 min in a clinical centrifuge to remove any gross tissue debris. The sperm were resuspended in a final volume of 5 mL of either physiological solution mimicking epididymal uminal fluid or MW then centrifuged at 500 × g for 8 min in a round-bottomed tube. Sperm from the resultant pellet were counted, assessed for motility, and diluted for use. In all cases, large-bore plastic transfer pipettes or large-orifice pipette tips were used to minimize damage to the sperm membranes. After collection and washing, sperm were incubated under physiological conditions in medium mimicking epididymal luminal fluid, non-capacitating conditions in MW, or capacitating conditions in MMW (MW with 10 mM NaHCO3, 3 mM 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin) for 1 h in a 37°C water bath at a final concentration of 4 × 106 sperm in 600 μL. After incubation, sperm were processed for indirect immunofluorescence as described below.
Purification of SDS-insoluble sperm heads and tails
Cauda epididymal sperm were homogenized in 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 75 mM NaCl, 24 mM EDTA, protease inhibitors, pH 6.0 (S-EDTA), layered onto a 1.6 M sucrose cushion in S-EDTA and centrifuged at 5000 × g for 1 h at room temperature . The SDS-resistant head structures (nuclei) were collected from the pellet. The SDS-resistant tail structures (flagellar accessory structures lacking the plasma membrane and axonemes) were collected from the interface (Figure 1). The purity was visually assessed by light microscopy to determine adequate head and flagellar accessory structure (‘tail’) separation.
Detergent fractionation of spermatogenic and sperm cells
Mixed germ cells and cauda epididymal sperm were collected as described above. For each cell population, 106 cells in 100 μL of PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 were incubated at room temperature for 10 min then centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 1 min. Triton X-100 soluble and insoluble proteins were collected from the supernatant and pellet, respectively. Further detergent extraction was performed on the Triton X-100 insoluble proteins (pellets). One hundred microliters of S-EDTA was added to the Triton X-100 insoluble protein pellet, incubated at room temperature for 10 min, homogenized, and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 1 min. The Triton X-100/S-EDTA soluble and insoluble proteins were collected from the supernatant and pellet, respectively.
Protein extraction and immunoblot analysis
The spermatogenic cells and sperm cells were concentrated by centrifugation, washed in 1 mL of PBS, resuspended in sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 1.67% SDS, 10% glycerol), and boiled for 5 min. Detergent extracted proteins were mixed with sample buffer and boiled for 5 min. Other tissues were homogenized, sonicated, and boiled in the sample buffer. After centrifugation, the supernatants were recovered and saved. Protein concentrations were determined by the BCA protein assay (Pierce Chemical, Rockford, IL, USA) and then dithiothreitol (DTT) and bromophenol blue were added to final concentrations of 100 mM and 0.002%, respectively. The samples were boiled for 5 min, and protein samples (15 μg per lane) were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) in 10% polyacrylamide gels . The gels were then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes . After the membranes were blocked with TBSS (500 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) or TBST (125 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.1% Tween 20) containing 5% BSA, they were incubated with primary antibody (1:500 anti-MNS1, 1:100 anti-trichoplein (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) or 1:1,000 anti-MFN2 (AbCam, Cambridge, MA, USA)) for 1 h. The antibody against MNS1 has been previously characterized . We affinity-purified the MNS1 antibody from anti-MNS1 sera using the immunoblot purification method . After washing with TBSS or TBST, the blots were incubated for 1 h with secondary antibody (donkey anti-rabbit IgG or anti-mouse IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA), 1:5,000 in 5% BSA in TBSS or TBST) and, after washing with TBSS or TBST, the bound enzyme was developed with the ECL kit (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s directions.
Co-immunoprecipitation of spermatogenic cells
Co-immunoprecipitation was performed using the Direct Magnetic IP/Co-IP Kit (Pierce Chemical) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, mixed germ cells, collected as described above, were lysed with ice-cold IP Lysis/Wash Buffer on ice for 5 min. After centrifugation at 13,000 × g, the protein concentration was determined by the BCA protein assay (Pierce Chemical). Five micrograms of MNS1 purified antibody or MFN2 antibody was coupled to the N-hydroxysuccinimide-activated magnetic beads. Two milligrams of isolated mixed germ cell protein was added to the antibody-coupled magnetic beads and incubated with rotation for 2 h. After washing the unbound protein from the beads, the bound protein was eluted from the beads with Elution Buffer. Unbound antibody, unbound antigen, and elution were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting as described above. Blots were probed with anti-MNS1 and anti-MFN2 antibodies.
Indirect immunofluorescence analysis
One million mixed germ cells from Red-Green mice were collected as described above and attached to polylysine-coated coverslips for 15 min. Cells were fixed in 0.1 M PIPES, pH 6.8, containing 2 mM EGTA, 20 mM MgCl2, 2% paraformaldehyde, and 0.1% glutaraldehyde. After washing with 0.15 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, the cells were permeabilized for 2 min with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS . In other experiments, one million caput or cauda epididymal sperm, collected as described above, were attached to polylysine-coated coverslips for 15 min then fixed and permeabilized with ice-cold acetone/methanol (1:1) for 1 min.
After extensive washing with PBS, the coverslips were incubated at 37°C for 1 h with 10% goat serum in PBS (blocking solution). The coverslips were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies (1:100 anti-MNS1 and/or 1:200 anti-MFN2) diluted in blocking solution. The following day, the coverslips were incubated for 1 h at 37°C with the corresponding Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:500; GE Healthcare) diluted in blocking solution. In cases of dual staining, coverslips were incubated for 1 h at 37°C with anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488- and anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:500; GE Healthcare) diluted in blocking solution. Finally, the coverslips were mounted on slides using 15 μL of Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL, USA), observed with a Nikon Eclipse TE 2000-U inverted microscope (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY, USA), and photographed with a CFW-1610C digital FireWire camera (Scion, Frederick, MD, USA) using the NIH ImageJ imaging software available online (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). Nomarski differential interference contrast micrographs were photographed in parallel with the fluorescence images. The polarizing elements in the differential interference contrast light path were removed prior to capturing the images. Negative controls using pre-immune sera, normal sera, or secondary antibody alone were also used to check for specificity.
RNA preparation and RT-PCR
List of primer sets used for collection of experimental data
Forward primer (5’-3’)
Reverse primer (5’-3’)
GCC AGC TTC CTT GAA GAC AC
GCA GAA CTT TGT CCC AGA GC
CAG TTC CTC GCA GAC AAA CA
GGC CTT GCT ATG AAG ACT CG
GAC AAA GGC AGA GGC TTG AC
CAA GCC ATA ACA ACC CGA CT
GGT GAA GGT CGG TGT GAA CG
CTC GCT CCT GGA AGA TGG TG
ATG TTA CCA CGG AGC TGG AC
AAC TGC TTC TCC GTC TGC AT
CTA TGA GCG ACT GAC CTG GA
CAC TGG CGT ATT CCA CAA AC
CCT CAA AGA ACA TGC TGC AA
GGC CTT GCT ATG AAG ACT CG
AAG CAG CTG GAG GAA ACA CT
TTG ATG ATC TCT GCC TGC TC
AAC TTT GGC ATT GTG GAA GG
GGA TGC AGG GAT GAT GTT CT
Ribosomal Protein S16
AGA TGA TCG AGC CGC GC
GCT ACC AGG GCC TTT GAG ATC GA
Preparation of RNA and quantitative RT-PCR
For quantitative RT-PCR assays, products were amplified with the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and analyzed with the ABI 7900 HT Sequence Detection system (Applied Biosystems). The following PCR protocol was used: (1) denaturation at 95°C for 1 s; (2) amplification and quantification at 60°C for 20 s then repeated for 40 cycles; (3) a dissociation curve program at 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 15 s, 95°C for 15 s; (4) cooling at 4°C. Amplicons were analyzed by generating a dissociation curve and determining the threshold cycle (Ct) value for each transcript. The relative quantification of gene expression was analyzed by the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method . The mRNAs corresponding to ribosomal protein S16 (accession number: BC082286) and GAPDH (accession number: M32599) were used as controls . Primer sets used are listed in Table 1.
MNS1 shares a conserved region with mitostatin
Mfn2is expressed in the testis
Mfn2mRNA levels decrease from pachytene spermatocytes to condensing spermatids
MFN2 is found in reproductive and somatic tissues with a high ciliary content
Using SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting, proteins from somatic tissues, reproductive tissues, spermatogenic cells, caput epididymal sperm, and cauda epididymal sperm were probed with antibodies against MFN2 and MNS1 (Figure 5). MFN2 was seen in tissues from brain, kidney, liver, and, faintly, heart. This protein was found in all reproductive tissues, spermatogenic cells, and epididymal sperm examined. Three additional immunoreactive bands (M r of 70,000, 52,000, and 17,000) were noted only in the testis, ovary, oviduct, and uterus samples.
MFN2 and MNS1 form a protein complex in spermatogenic cells
MFN2 immunofluorescence pattern changes from the midpiece to the entire flagellum after incubation
MNS1 localizes to the sperm flagellum
MFN2 and MNS1 co-localize to the sperm flagellum
MFN2 localizes to the mitochondria of the spermatogenic cell cytoplasm
MFN2 is present in the tail structures of cauda sperm
In sperm and spermatogenic cells, MNS1 was present as three closely migrating bands (M r of 72,000, 64,000, and 60,000) in structures resistant to detergent (Triton X-100, S-EDTA, Triton X-100/S-EDTA) extraction (Figure 11: Bottom). It was seen more abundantly in the SDS-resistant tail structures of the cauda epididymal sperm compared to SDS-resistant head structures, which may represent a slight contamination of the head structures with tail components. MNS1 existed as two closely migrating bands (M r of 64,000 and 60,000), with a potential, faint, higher third band (M r of 72,000) in the cauda epididymal sperm and spermatogenic cell samples. Similar to the results obtained above, these experiments demonstrated that MFN2 and MNS1 were associated with the sperm flagellar structures lacking the axoneme. Furthermore, the complete solubilization of both proteins required the utilization of reducing agent.
Here we hypothesize a model whereby MNS1 acts as a scaffolding protein in the sperm flagellum, interacting with the mitochondrial sheath and the fibrous sheath through communications with MFN2. This model is based on the homology between MNS1 and mitostatin (Figure 2). Recent discoveries have linked the latter protein with mitochondrial movement in somatic cells . Mitostatin is associated with the mitochondrial outer membrane, and over-expression leads to reduced mitochondrial motility, whereas lack of it enhances mitochondrial movement. The activity appears to be mediated through binding the mitochondria to the actin intermediate filaments. In addition, mitostatin is involved in regulating mitochondrial-ER binding via MFN2 .
Further support for a role of mammalian MFN2 in mitochondrial dynamics in spermatogenic cells comes from studies in the fruit fly. Following meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster spermatogenesis, the spermatid mitochondria collect on one side of the haploid nucleus and fuse together into two giant aggregates; these two mitochondrial aggregates then wrap around each other to form a spherical structure termed the Nebenkern . This process is governed by the fuzzy onions 1 (Fzo) protein, a large transmembrane GTPase associated with the outer mitochondrial membrane. Fzo is required for the formation of the giant mitochondrial derivatives during spermatogenesis, and loss of its function causes alterations of spermatogenesis and male sterility in Drosophila. This protein is homologous to MFN1 and MFN2, providing important clues to their roles in mitochondrial physiology in mammals .
MFN1 and MFN2 sequences are highly homologous (81%) and display similar topology in the membrane of mitochondria , yet MFN2 appears to modulate more than mitochondrial fusion in mammalian cells. MFN1 and MFN2 possess an N-terminal GTPase domain and a coiled-coil domain located near the N-terminus that is exposed to the cytosol. In somatic cells, they are composed of two transmembrane domains that span the outer mitochondrial membrane as well as two regions for protein-protein interaction. The C-terminus ends in a coiled-coil motif. MFN2 possesses an N-terminal RAS binding domain . MFN1 has higher GTPase activity and induces fusion more efficiently than MFN2. It requires a protein on the inner mitochondrial membrane, OPA1, for this function [27, 28]. The increased mitochondrial fusion activity of MFN1 over MFN2 lends to the hypothesis that MFN2 plays a more diverse role in the cell.
Deletion of Mfn1 or Mfn2 impairs embryonic development in the mouse . During embryogenesis there is a switch from glycolytic to oxidative metabolism in cells, which is, in part, regulated by the Mfn genes. In wild-type mouse embryonic fibroblasts, mitochondria move back and forth along the long axis of the cell on radial tracks. In contrast, the tubular shaped mitochondria from Mfn1-/- embryonic fibroblasts are fragmented and display disorganized movement. The mutant embryos die midgestation . In Mfn2-/- embryonic fibroblasts, tubular mitochondria display organized movement yet spherically shaped mitochondria display uncoordinated motion. MFN2 is also required for placentation. Mfn2-/- mutant embryos have a disruption of the placental trophoblast giant cell layer, and they also die midgestation . Mfn1-/- mutant embryonic cells have less fusion activity than Mfn2-/- embryonic cells further indicating that MFN2 may play multiple roles in the cell beyond mitochondrial fusion.
Here, we began our studies by characterizing the presence of MFN2 during spermatogenesis and its localization within mouse spermatogenic cells and epididymal sperm. We report that MFN2 and MNS1 are interacting partners of the sperm flagellum and are present during spermatogenesis. Studies of expression by quantitative RT-PCR enabled us to determine at what stages Mfn2 and Mns1 expression began and in what cell types and tissues these proteins were present. A gene that is more highly expressed in spermatids relative to spermatocytes may be more likely to encode a protein that will function in flagellar biogenesis. Similarly, a protein that is highly expressed in ciliary tissues such as brain, trachea, kidney, and oviduct, may be involved in axonemal function. In Drosophila, Fzo protein is specifically and transiently expressed in spermatids .
Quantitative RT-PCR indicated that Mfn2 and Mns1 were highly expressed in spermatogenic cells decreasing from pachytene spermatocytes to condensing spermatids (Figure 4). Although this is not in line with an expected increased expression in spermatids versus spermatocytes, it is possible that these proteins are made in abundance during late meiosis to prepare the cell to begin flagellar biogenesis immediately following the second and final meiotic division. Nevertheless, the high level of expression in spermatids indicates a role for these proteins in flagellar biogenesis. While we do not see high expression of these genes in other tissues such as testis, brain, trachea, kidney, and oviduct by quantitative RT-PCR, we do see their protein products in these tissues. Testis, ovary, oviduct, and uterus samples displayed three additional MFN2 bands that could be variants specific to reproductive tissues. We found that the MNS1 protein existed as doublet bands in spermatogenic cells, epididymal sperm, and reproductive tissues, which may be a result of an alteration in the phosphorylation status of this protein. We also noted four additional bands in testis samples indicating potential testis-specific variants or protein degradation (Figure 6).
The use of co-immunoprecipitation provided evidence to support our hypothesis that MFN2 and MNS1 form a protein complex in spermatogenic cells. When MFN2 was used as bait, MNS1 was co-immunoprecipitated as two closely migrating bands (Figure 5). The reciprocal experiment was also true; when MNS1 was used as bait, MFN2 was co-immunoprecipitated (Figure 5). These experiments provide preliminary data for an interaction between these two proteins in developing spermatids. Further experiments are underway to investigate additional proteins that may be associated with the MFN2-MNS1 protein complex found in spermatogenic cells. We hypothesize that ODF2 is also a member of this complex.
Co-localization of MFN2 and MNS1 was observed in the sperm flagellum (Figure 9). This result lends further support to our hypothesis. The localization in epididymal sperm of each protein independently was determined to be flagellar with MFN2 being confined to the midpiece of the tail of freshly isolated sperm (Figure 7) and MNS1 being present throughout the sperm flagellum (Figure 8). However, when cauda epididymal sperm were incubated in non-physiological conditions, the pattern of MFN2 fluorescence was altered from being present in the flagellar midpiece to being present throughout the flagellum. This modification was not observed when sperm were maintained in a physiologic environment. The pattern of MNS1 fluorescence was not different, regardless of the conditions used to maintain the sperm. The alterations observed in MFN2 have been noted in boar sperm; however, these experiments did not investigate sperm maintained under conditions mimicking the lumen of the epididymis . Our results indicate there could be unmasking of antigenic epitopes in the more distal regions of the sperm flagellum. The location of MFN2 in the sperm midpiece is logical because this is the location of all of the sperm mitochondria. However, the role of MFN2 in the post-acrosomal region and principal piece is unclear. We speculate a role for MFN2 in flagellar biogenesis and disassembly at fertilization.
To assess the biochemical nature of MFN2 and MNS1 localization in spermatogenic and sperm cells, we extracted these cells with a series of detergents. SDS-treatment solubilizes the tubulin components of the axoneme while other flagellar components such as the ODFs, mitochondrial sheath, and fibrous sheath remain in the SDS-resistant fraction . MFN2 was observed in the SDS-resistant tail fraction of the sperm; however, it was not seen in the detergent-soluble fractions. Similarly, MFN2 was not present in the detergent-soluble fractions of the spermatogenic cell population. These results may be due to a low level of MFN2 protein in these extracts or, possibly, the epitope(s) recognized by the antibody is(are) hidden until it(they) is(are) exposed by SDS extraction. MNS1 was located in the detergent-resistant structures of spermatogenic cells and cauda epididymal sperm and was detected as three closely migrating bands by SDS-PAGE. It is possible that MNS1 exists in several forms in spermatogenic and sperm cells.
The biogenesis of the sperm tail is an orderly process where each round spermatid elaborates a flagellum initially consisting of the axoneme surrounded by the plasma membrane. Subsequently, the flagellar accessory structures (mitochondrial sheath, ODFs, and fibrous sheath) are produced in a defined manner . Several lines of evidence support that MFN2 and MNS1 are present and may play a role in flagellar and, potentially, ciliary biogenesis. First, Mfn2 and Mns1 expression occurred at high levels during spermatogenesis and their protein products are present. Second, we observed that both proteins were present in spermatogenic cells, caput and cauda epididymal sperm, and male as well as female reproductive tissues. Lastly, both proteins form a protein complex and co-localized to the sperm flagellum. In this manuscript we hypothesize a role for MNS1 whereby it acts as a scaffolding protein in the sperm flagellum, interacting with MFN2. Future studies are underway to substantiate this hypothesis further.
Basic Local Alignment Search Tool
Bovine Serum Albumin
Ethylene Glycol Tetraacetic Acid
Fuzzy Onions 1
Glyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase
Green Fluorescent Protein
Mixed Germ Cells
Modified Whitten Medium
Meiosis-Specific Nuclear Structural 1
Messenger Ribonucleic Acid
National Institute of Health
Outer Dense Fibers
Outer Dense Protein 2
Optic Atrophy 1
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis
Phosphate Buffered Saline
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction
Red Fluorescent Protein
Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate
Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid
Tris Buffered Saline High Salt
Tris Buffered Saline Tween
Tris (Hydroxymethyl) Aminomethane
The authors thank Drs. Jeremy Wang and Jian Zhou for their generous gift of the MNS1 antibody and MNS1-deficient mice. We thank Jeremy Wang for the helpful discussions on this study as well as for critically reading this manuscript.
NIH grants R01HD051999, P30ES013508, and R01HD057144.
- Zhou J, Yang F, Leu NA, Wang PJ: MNS1 is essential for spermiogenesis and motile ciliary functions in mice. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8: e1002516-10.1371/journal.pgen.1002516.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marchler-Bauer A, Zheng C, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Geer LY, Geer RC, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Lanczycki CJ, Lu F, Lu S, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Zhang D, Bryant SH: CDD: conserved domains and protein three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41: D348-D352. 10.1093/nar/gks1243.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pugacheva EN, Jablonski SA, Hartman TR, Henske EP, Golemis EA: HEF1-dependent aurora a activation induces disassembly of the primary cilium. Cell. 2007, 129: 1351-1363. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.035.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kinzel D, Boldt K, Davis EE, Burtscher I, Trümbach D, Diplas B, Attié-Bitach T, Wurst W, Katsanis N, Ueffing M, Lickert H: Pitchfork regulates primary cilia disassembly and left-right asymmetry. Dev Cell. 2010, 19: 66-77. 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inoko A, Matsuyama M, Goto H, Ohmuro-Matsuyama Y, Hayashi Y, Enomoto M, Ibi M, Urano T, Yonemura S, Kiyono T, Izawa I, Inagaki M: Trichoplein and aurora a block aberrant primary cilia assembly in proliferating cells. J Cell Biol. 2012, 197: 391-405. 10.1083/jcb.201106101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cerqua C, Anesti V, Pyakurel A, Liu D, Naon D, Wiche G, Baffa R, Dimmer KS, Scorrano L: Trichoplein/mitostatin regulates endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondria juxtaposition. EMBO Rep. 2010, 11: 854-860. 10.1038/embor.2010.151.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bach D, Pich S, Soriano FX, Vega N, Baumgartner B, Oriola J, Daugaard JR, Lloberas J, Camps M, Zierath JR, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Wallberg-Henriksson H, Laville M, Palacı́n M, Vidal H, Rivera F, Brand M, Zorzano A: Mitofusin-2 determines mitochondrial network architecture and mitochondrial metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 17190-17197. 10.1074/jbc.M212754200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ramió-Lluch L, Fernández-Novell JM, Peña A, Bucci D, Rigau T, Rodríguez-Gil JE: “In vitro” capacitation and subsequent acrosome reaction are related to changes in the expression and location of midpiece actin and mitofusin-2 in boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2012, 77: 979-988. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.10.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flores E, Fernández-Novell JM, Peña A, Rigau T, Rodríguez-Gil JE: Cryopreservation-induced alterations in boar spermatozoa mitochondrial function are related to changes in the expression and location of midpiece mitofusin-2 and actin network. Theriogenology. 2010, 74: 354-363. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.02.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bellvé AR, Millette CF, Bhatnagar YM, O’Brien DA: Dissociation of the mouse testis and characterization of isolated spermatogenic cells. J Histo Cytochem. 1977, 25: 480-494. 10.1177/25.7.893996.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hasuwa H, Muro Y, Ikawa M, Kato N, Tsujimoto Y, Okabe M: Transgenic mouse sperm that have green acrosome and red mitochondria allow visualization of sperm and their acrosome reaction in vivo. Exp Anim. 2010, 59: 105-107. 10.1538/expanim.59.105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gerton GL, Millette CF: Generation of flagella by cultured mouse spermatids. J Cell Biol. 1984, 98: 619-628. 10.1083/jcb.98.2.619.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Romrell LJ, Bellvé AR, Fawcett DW: Separation of mouse spermatogenic cells by sedimentation velocity: a morphological characterization. Dev Biol. 1976, 49: 119-131. 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90262-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruan YC, Shum WWC, Belleannée C, Da Silva N, Breton S: ATP secretion in the male reproductive tract: essential role of CFTR. J Physiol Lond. 2012, 590: 4209-4222. 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.230581.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Travis AJ, Jorgez CJ, Merdiushev T, Jones BH, Dess DM, Diaz-Cueto L, Storey BT, Kopf GS, Moss SB: Functional relationships between capacitation-dependent cell signaling and compartmentalized metabolic pathways in murine spermatozoa. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 7630-7636. 10.1074/jbc.M006217200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O’Brien DA, Bellvé AR: Protein constituents of the mouse spermatozoon. I. An electrophoretic characterization. Dev Biol. 1980, 75: 386-404. 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90171-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227: 680-685. 10.1038/227680a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J: Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979, 76: 4350-4354. 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kurien BT: Affinity purification of autoantibodies from an antigen strip excised from a nitrocellulose protein blot. Methods Mol Biol. 2009, 536: 201-211. 10.1007/978-1-59745-542-8_22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001, 25: 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jeong Y-J, Choi H-W, Shin H-S, Cui X-S, Kim N-H, Gerton GL, Jun JH: Optimization of real time RT-PCR methods for the analysis of gene expression in mouse eggs and preimplantation embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 2005, 71: 284-289. 10.1002/mrd.20269.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karnik NS, Newman S, Kopf GS, Gerton GL: Developmental expression of G protein alpha subunits in mouse spermatogenic cells: evidence that G alpha i is associated with the developing acrosome. Dev Biol. 1992, 152: 393-402. 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90146-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carrera A, Gerton GL, Moss SB: The major fibrous sheath polypeptide of mouse sperm: structural and functional similarities to the A-kinase anchoring proteins. Dev Biol. 1994, 165: 272-284. 10.1006/dbio.1994.1252.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hales KG, Fuller MT: Developmentally regulated mitochondrial fusion mediated by a conserved, novel, predicted GTPase. Cell. 1997, 90: 121-129. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80319-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Santel A, Fuller MT: Control of mitochondrial morphology by a human mitofusin. J Cell Sci. 2001, 114: 867-874.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rojo M, Legros F, Chateau D, Lombès A: Membrane topology and mitochondrial targeting of mitofusins, ubiquitous mammalian homologs of the transmembrane GTPase Fzo. J Cell Sci. 2002, 115: 1663-1674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ishihara N, Eura Y, Mihara K: Mitofusin 1 and 2 play distinct roles in mitochondrial fusion reactions via GTPase activity. J Cell Sci. 2004, 117: 6535-6546. 10.1242/jcs.01565.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cipolat S, Martins de Brito O, Dal Zilio B, Scorrano L: OPA1 requires mitofusin 1 to promote mitochondrial fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101: 15927-15932. 10.1073/pnas.0407043101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen H, Detmer SA, Ewald AJ, Griffin EE, Fraser SE, Chan DC: Mitofusins Mfn1 and Mfn2 coordinately regulate mitochondrial fusion and are essential for embryonic development. J Cell Biol. 2003, 160: 189-200. 10.1083/jcb.200211046.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Irons MJ, Clermont Y: Formation of the outer dense fibers during spermiogenesis in the rat. Anat Rec. 1982, 202: 463-471. 10.1002/ar.1092020405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.