Table 8 Percent completion of genes within initial curation priority categories
From: Sensing the cilium, digital capture of ciliary data for comparative genomics investigations
Type of experimental annotations and availability of references July 2013 | Total # genes | # genes NOT “completed” | # genes “completed” | % “completed” | Curation notes for “complete” genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No ciliary annotations, associated references—high priority | |||||
No ciliary annotations—ciliary references [#1] | 30 | 18 | 12 | 40.0% | 6 of 12 (2 Bardet–Biedl, 2 dynein, 2 IFT) |
No ciliary annotations—other references [#2] | 73 | 31 | 42 | 57.5% | 5 of 42 (3 dynein, 1 IFT, 1 sperm flagellum) |
Ciliary annotations in either BP or CC—medium priority | |||||
No ciliary BP annotations—ciliary references [#3] | 24 | 18 | 6 | 25.0% | 4 of 6 (1 BBSome, 3 IFT) |
No ciliary CC annotations—ciliary references [#3] | 9 | 6 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 of 3 (1 CPLANE) |
No ciliary BP annotations—other references [#4] | 14 | 12 | 2 | 14.3% | |
No ciliary CC annotations—other references [#4] | 5 | 3 | 2 | 40.0% | 1 of 2 (1 sperm flagellum) |
No ciliary annotations in BP and/or CC, no references—low priority | |||||
No ciliary annotations—no references [#5] | 83 | 49 | 34 | 41.0% | 17 of 34 (1 Bardet–Biedl, 1 CPLANE, 9 dynein, 6 IFT) |
No ciliary CC annotations—no references [#6] | 11 | 7 | 4 | 36.4% | 1 of 4 (1 CPLANE) |
No ciliary BP annotations—no references [#6] | 15 | 6 | 9 | 60.0% | 6 of 9 (2 Bardet–Biedl, 3 IFT, 1 sperm flagellum) |
Ciliary annotations in both BP and CC—low priority | |||||
Both BP and CC ciliary annotations—ciliary references [#7] | 15 | 6 | 9 | 60.0% | 6 of 9 (2 Bardet–Biedl, 2 IFT, 1 dynein, 1 sperm flagellum) |
Both BP and CC ciliary annotations—other references [#7] | 7 | 6 | 1 | 14.3% | 1 of 1 (1 IFT) |
Both BP and CC ciliary annotations—no references [#8] | 24 | 14 | 10 | 41.7% | 8 of 10 (2 BBSome, 6 IFT) |
Totals | 310 | 176 | 134 | 43.2% | |