Open Access

Basal body structure and composition in the apicomplexans Toxoplasma and Plasmodium

Cilia20165:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13630-016-0025-5

Received: 2 October 2015

Accepted: 20 January 2016

Published: 4 February 2016

Abstract

The phylum Apicomplexa encompasses numerous important human and animal disease-causing parasites, including the Plasmodium species, and Toxoplasma gondii, causative agents of malaria and toxoplasmosis, respectively. Apicomplexans proliferate by asexual replication and can also undergo sexual recombination. Most life cycle stages of the parasite lack flagella; these structures only appear on male gametes. Although male gametes (microgametes) assemble a typical 9+2 axoneme, the structure of the templating basal body is poorly defined. Moreover, the relationship between asexual stage centrioles and microgamete basal bodies remains unclear. While asexual stages of Plasmodium lack defined centriole structures, the asexual stages of Toxoplasma and closely related coccidian apicomplexans contain centrioles that consist of nine singlet microtubules and a central tubule. There are relatively few ultra-structural images of Toxoplasma microgametes, which only develop in cat intestinal epithelium. Only a subset of these include sections through the basal body: to date, none have unambiguously captured organization of the basal body structure. Moreover, it is unclear whether this basal body is derived from pre-existing asexual stage centrioles or is synthesized de novo. Basal bodies in Plasmodium microgametes are thought to be synthesized de novo, and their assembly remains ill-defined. Apicomplexan genomes harbor genes encoding δ- and ε-tubulin homologs, potentially enabling these parasites to assemble a typical triplet basal body structure. Moreover, the UNIMOD components (SAS6, SAS4/CPAP, and BLD10/CEP135) are conserved in these organisms. However, other widely conserved basal body and flagellar biogenesis elements are missing from apicomplexan genomes. These differences may indicate variations in flagellar biogenesis pathways and in basal body arrangement within the phylum. As apicomplexan basal bodies are distinct from their metazoan counterparts, it may be possible to selectively target parasite structures in order to inhibit microgamete motility which drives generation of genetic diversity in Toxoplasma and transmission for Plasmodium.

Keywords

Microtubule organizing center Microgamete Coccidia Malaria Centriole Flagellum

Basic phylogeny and apicomplexan life styles

Apicomplexans are unicellular protozoa that belong to kingdom Chromalveolata and the infrakingdom alveolata. Chromalveolates descended from a heterotrophic bikont (a bi-flagellated eukaryote), in which a secondary endosymbiotic event gave rise to a plastid-like organelle [1]. Members of the alveolata are characterized by cortical alveoli (flattened vesicles located between the plasma membrane and a network of subpellicular microtubules), and micropore [2]. They are further divided into phyla including ciliates, dinoflagellates, and apicomplexans, which differ mainly in their motile machinery [3, 4]. While ciliates and dinoflagellates move by means of cilia or flagella, invasive stage apicomplexans typically move by gliding motility. Additionally, many ciliates and dinoflagellates are free-living, while all apicomplexans are obligate parasites.

The phylum Apicomplexa encompasses numerous important disease-causing pathogens including the agents of malaria, toxoplasmosis, cryptosporidiosis, Texas and East Coast fever, and coccidiosis. The most widely studied of these are Plasmodium species, agents of malaria [5] and Toxoplasma gondii, which causes toxoplasmosis [6]. Apicomplexans undergo asexual (vegetative) replication in order to cause acute infection (Fig. 1a, b). During asexual replication, Apicomplexa use distinct cell division schemes of fascinating complexity and variability to adapt to different hosts and suit specific intracellular niches [7]. Both Plasmodium and Toxoplasma can also differentiate into gametes and undergo sexual recombination (Fig. 1d, e). In Toxoplasma, this occurs in the intestinal epithelium of cats and the resulting oocyst is shed in cat feces and sporulates in the environment. New infections are initiated by accidental ingestion of oocysts in contaminated food or water. Toxoplasma may also be transmitted by ingestion of infected animals harboring tissue cysts that contain latent asexual stage bradyzoite forms. Plasmodium gametes complete development and fuse to form a zygote in the stomach of mosquitos that have taken up infected blood. The zygote penetrates through the gut epithelium and undergoes meiosis and many rounds of replication to produce sporozoites. These migrate to the salivary glands and infect a new host when the mosquito takes another blood meal. Significantly, the sexual cycle is obligatory to natural transmission of most Plasmodium infections.
Fig. 1

Life cycle and microtubule-based structures of apicomplexa. ae Simplified schematic of the life cycle of Apicomplexa in their different hosts. Apicomplexa replicate either sexually or asexually. Differentiation into gametes and sexual replication occur within definitive hosts. Definitive hosts vary among apicomplexan species; T. gondii replicates sexually within felines, while Plasmodium species do so in mosquitoes. Flagellated forms of Apicomplexa are only found in definitive hosts, where they differentiate into male (micro) and female (macro) gametes. Fusion of gametes gives rise to a zygote which further differentiates into oocysts able to sporulate. Microgametes of different Apicomplexa vary in their number of flagella. T. gondii microgametes, represented here, have two protruding flagella. Plasmodium spp. microgametes emerge with a single flagellum upon terminal differentiation, and are assembled entirely within the cytoplasm of the undifferentiated originating cell. a, b In intermediate hosts, such as humans, apicomplexans grow vegetatively. Distinct replication modes among Apicomplexa allow them to adapt to different host niches. However, they all generate new infective zoites by assembly of daughter cells within the mother cell´s cytosol or at the mother cell surface, and undergo closed mitosis of the nuclear content. c Infective forms of Apicomplexa organize microtubules using functionally and physically distinct MTOCs. subpellicular microtubules, which impart shape and polarity to the cells, are organized by an MTOC localized at the apex, known as the APR. In addition, coccidian species in the phylum contain a specialized tubulin-based structure known as the conoid which has been evolutionarily linked to basal bodies of related flagellated alveolates [51, 52, 56]. Nuclear division occurs by closed mitosis. Chromosomes are organized by an intra-nuclear spindle nucleated by a cytosolic centrosome. Apicomplexa centriole-based centrosomes contain two centrioles of 9+1 singlet microtubule structure, oriented parallel to each other. Malaria-causing parasites (Plasmodium spp.) do not have canonical centrosomes, and organize their mitotic spindle from a “centriolar plaque” which can be identified using anti-centrin antibodies. The centriolar plaque is embedded in the nuclear envelope (not shown). d, e Microgamete flagella and basal body structures. Apicomplexa flagellar axonemes are composed of 9 doublet microtubules and a central pair [1518]. d Basal bodies in malaria are better characterized, and consist of nine single A-tubules with no central tube, embedded in an electron-dense mass [16]. e Basal body structures are not well characterized in T. gondii. A small number of ultra-structural studies have led researchers to propose multiple alternative microtubule arrangements; a nine singlet microtubules, and a central tubule [20], atypical 9+0 and 9+2 arrangements, or a typical triplet microtubule structure with ninefold symmetry [8, 20, 2226]

Basal body organization in apicomplexans

Electron microscopy established early on that apicomplexan microtubule organizing centers (MTOCs) are structurally different from centrosomes found in most model systems. Toxoplasma has two juxtanuclear centrioles, arranged parallel to each other. These exhibit a 9+1 singlet microtubule symmetry, and are shorter than their animal counterparts (200 × 200 nm) (Fig. 1c) [711]. Plasmodium species appear to lack centrioles; instead, the spindle microtubules originate from a MTOC known as the “centriolar plaque” (CP) that is located within the nuclear envelope. The CP can be identified using antibodies to centrin [1214]. The invasive asexual stages of apicomplexans are not flagellated, and therefore neither of these MTOCs functions as a basal body. In both Toxoplasma and Plasmodium, only the male gamete, known as the microgamete, assembles basal bodies and flagella (Fig. 1d, e).

Mature Plasmodium sperm have a single flagella (Fig. 1d) while Toxoplasma microgametes are bi-flagellated (Fig. 1e). In both cases, the flagellar axoneme consists of 9 doublet microtubules and a central pair (Fig. 1d, e) [1518]. Basal bodies in malaria consist of nine single A-tubules with no central tube, embedded in an electron-dense mass (Figs. 1d, 2a) (see Ref. [19] and Fig. 1f in Ref. [16]). The basal body microtubules extend 250 nm [19]. Basal body structure, however, remains somewhat unclear in Toxoplasma. T. gondii differentiates into gametes and reproduces sexually within felines. Therefore, microgamete isolation requires heavy infection of felid enteric tissue. This is technically challenging, and a limiting aspect to the study of this stage of the parasite life cycle. Moreover, transverse sections through the basal body barrel are uncommon in ultra-structural studies. The small number of images obtained to date suggests nine short singlet microtubules, and a central tubule basal body structure, which closely resemble the asexual form’s centriole structure (Fig. 2b–e) [17, 20, 21] (see Fig. 2a–d in Ref. [17], and Fig. 25 in Ref. [21]). On the other hand, studies of gametogenesis in closely related apicomplexans (other coccidian such as Eimeria and Sarcocystis) suggest that T. gondii basal bodies could consist of either typical triplet microtubule structure with ninefold symmetry (see Fig. 3b in Ref. [22] and Fig. 10 in Ref. [23] in Eimeria and Sarcocystis, respectively) or atypical 9+0 or 9+2 arrangements of singlet microtubules [8, 20, 2226] (Figs. 1e, 2f). It is possible, however, that the latter correspond to serial sections through the transition zone or flagellar axoneme that are incorrectly interpreted as basal bodies.
Fig. 2

Basal Body and axoneme structures in Plasmodium, Toxoplasma, and Sarcocystis. a Serial transverse sections of the developing axoneme of a P. falciparum microgamete. From left to right: a basal body made of singlet microtubules, and embedded in an electron-dense mass and the distal flagellar region made of a 9+2 microtubule arrangement, can be observed. Reproduced from Fig. 1f in [16] with permission. b Transverse section through the pole (P) of a developing T. gondii microgamete. Several organelles are visible including a basal body (B) and the nucleus (N). c Longitudinal section through a T. gondii microgamete where one flagellum and its originating basal body (B) are visible. d Longitudinal section through a T. gondii microgamete where two flagella, and their originating basal bodies (B), are visible. bd Reproduced from Fig. 2a, b, and d in [17], respectively. e Longitudinal section through the anterior portion of a T. gondii microgamete showing the position of the basal body (B) and flagella (FL) enclosed by a unit membrane (UM). Reproduced from Fig. 25 in [21]. f Transverse section through a basal body of a Sarcocystis suihominis microgamete, a coccidian parasite closely related to T. gondii, showing some microtubules doublets and triplets (arrow, B). g Transverse section through two flagellar axonemes (arrow, F) of S. suihominis. f, g Reproduced from Figs. 9 and 10 from [23], respectively

The Toxoplasma genome (available at toxodb.org [27]) contains genes for three α- and β-tubulin isotypes [28, 29]. Inferences from proteomes and mRNA data suggest that all isotypes are expressed at some levels in asexual forms and in oocysts [30] (Fig. 1a). The T. gondii genome also contains a single γ-tubulin gene, which has been shown to localize to centrioles [30, 31]. Both δ- and ε-tubulin isoforms appear to be present in the genome; however, publically available mass spectroscopy data (toxodb.org) do not provide evidence for expression in asexual forms. Therefore, T. gondii is likely equipped with the necessary elements to assemble triplet microtubule blades of basal bodies [3236]. Whether δ- and ε-tubulin genes are expressed specifically in microgametes remains an intriguing question, as this could explain the developmental maturation of singlet centrioles into triplet basal bodies that template flagellar axonemes [30]. Unfortunately, to date, expression data are not available for T. gondii gametes. In addition to α-, β-, and γ-tubulin genes, P. falciparum has single apparent homologs of δ- and ε-tubulin (PF3D7_1475700 and PF3D7_0933800, respectively), and neither is expressed at significantly higher levels during gametogenesis (expression data available at plasmodb.org).

Microtubule organizing centers during the parasite life cycle

Apicomplexans use spatially and morphologically distinct microtubule organizing centers (MTOCs) to functionally organize independent microtubule subsets. Cell shape and polarity is organized by subpellicular microtubules nucleated by a ring-shaped MTOC localized at the cell apex, known as the apical polar ring (APR) (Fig. 1c). The APR consists of concentrically arranged tubulin rings, and a central pair of microtubules [37]. Microtubules organized by the APR emerge in comma-shaped fashion and extend two-thirds into the cell length. Coccidian apicomplexans, including T. gondii, also construct an additional tubulin-based structure known as the conoid [8]. The conoid is composed of fourteen tightly apposed tubulin-based filaments that spiral counterclockwise toward the pre-conoidal rings [8, 38]. It can be extended from or retracted into the APR. Though no direct evidence for its function has been demonstrated, a role in host cell invasion has been frequently ascribed to this structure [37]. Plasmodium merozoites have a dramatically reduced set of subpellicular microtubules, also organized from an APR [39]. Nuclear division occurs by closed mitosis: the nuclear envelope remains intact and spindle microtubules are inserted into pores in the nuclear envelope. In coccidians such as T. gondii, spindle microtubules are organized by a specialized structure known as the centrocone. The centrocone is a protrusion in the nuclear envelope associated with the cytoplasmic centrioles (Fig. 1c).

Basal body origins

In T. gondii, basal bodies have been proposed to either form de novo or to be derived from the pre-existing centrioles [18]. However, because the basal body structure remains undefined, a number of hypothetical biogenesis pathways can be proposed. If basal bodies are composed of nine singlet microtubules and a central tube, pre-existing centrioles could become basal bodies directly. It is also possible that the singlet microtubule-based centrioles mature into triplet microtubule-based basal bodies by gamete-specific expression of δ- and ε-tubulin genes, giving rise to a more typical basal body configuration. Additionally, basal bodies could be synthesized de novo as is proposed to be the case in Plasmodium, in which case the alternative 9+0 and 9+2 singlet structures reported could be generated.

Plasmodium sexual differentiation occurs in the midgut of the female mosquito vector [16]. The signals that trigger differentiation and flagella formation (exflagellation) can be mimicked in vitro. Time course studies of the exflagellation process suggest that the basal body in Plasmodium forms de novo, but its position is defined by the pre-existing CP. Molecular data on how this process is regulated are lacking, but ultra-structural TEM studies suggest that the centriolar plaque and the emerging basal body are functionally and physically linked. A single study in the malaria-related parasite Haemoproteus columbae shows that the electron-dense mass of the centriolar plaque houses a single centriole made of singlet microtubules and a central pair prior to the appearance of flagella [16, 40]. This has been proposed to be an “intermediate” step in the formation of the basal body, which physically separates from the CP at a later stage, but retains a 9+1 singlet microtubule architecture [16]. Consistent with the suggestion that Plasmodium basal bodies are formed de novo during microgametogenesis, expression of the conserved centriole component SAS-6 is restricted to microgametes [41]. Moreover, SAS-6 knock-out parasites do not form motile microgametes [41].

Additional basal body structures or accessory structures have not been described in the literature thus far. Gene expression data or proteomes from distinct stages of gametogenesis are not available, therefore limiting our understanding of the basal body and flagellar structural components and biogenesis pathways. Clear homologs of key regulators of centriole biogenesis in other eukaryotes, such as PLK4 or PLK1, are missing from the apicomplexan genomes [42, 43]. Therefore, the biogenesis of centrioles and basal bodies is expected to be distinct from other conserved assembly pathways. In fact, recent studies described divergent regulatory elements participate in the duplication of the T. gondii’s centrosome, suggesting that the centrosome replication pathway in Apicomplexa is non-canonical. A MAP kinase homolog (TgMAPK-L1, [31]) and a NIMA-related kinase (TgNEK1–2, [44]) were shown to play critical roles in duplication and maintenance of the “right number” of centrosomes structures in T. gondii. However, the exact mechanism by which they participate in centrosome duplication remains to be deciphered. In addition, an aurora kinase homolog (TgARK1) associates with centrosomes specifically in S-phase in T. gondii, when centrosome duplication occurs, suggesting that it too could play a role in the process [31]. T. gondii centrosomes are organized into two independent functional segments, named “cores.” These cores are distinguishable in composition, and each of them coordinates functionally distinct aspects of cell division allowing the parasite for cell cycle flexibility and adaptability. The “inner core” facing the nuclear envelope coordinates chromosome segregation. Meanwhile, the “outer core” localizes distal to the nucleus, and coordinates the assembly of new daughter cells [31].

Identification of basal body components

Microgamete-specific proteomic studies have been achieved in Plasmodium because this stage is experimentally accessible, unlike the situation in Toxoplasma [45, 46]. These studies focused on identifying flagellar axoneme components, and while the results are informative for making inferences about axoneme properties, information on basal body components remains scarce. Plasmodium species lack intraflagellar transport (IFT) machinery [16, 47], and are devoid of most BBsome components which coordinate signaling functions in other flagella and cilia [48]. The T. gondii genome contains homologs of CEP164, BBS5, and IFT components, suggesting that IFT drives axoneme assembly [48]. These differences suggest that interesting differences in flagellar assembly pathways between these apicomplexans could exist: Plasmodium assembles flagella within the cytosol, while T. gondii microgamete´s flagella are likely to be extruded from the periphery.

Both T. gondii and Plasmodium genomes lack many basal body components. However, they encode the “UNIMOD” components SAS6, SAS4/CPAP, and BLD10/CEP135 [16]. Additionally, homologs of Meckelin (MKS3), a conserved protein linked to Meckel Syndrome, is present in the genomes of apicomplexans [48]. As MKS3 assists centriole migration to the cell surface prior to flagella formation, this supports the model that pre-existing centrioles directly act as basal bodies. T. gondii, but not Plasmodium, encodes a VFL1 homolog [48], which establishes basal body orientation in the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas [49]. Nonetheless, whether these components are expressed or indeed participate in basal body and flagellar assembly is unknown, as the roles of these apparent homologs have not been studied in apicomplexans. It is possible that these genes represent remnants of an ancestral flagellar assembly pathway that has been discarded by T. gondii. Molecular data supporting this alternative hypothesis are discussed below.

Notable basal body findings

The infectious asexual forms of Apicomplexa do not assemble flagella and therefore lack basal bodies. Nevertheless, the microtubule-based structures present in apicomplexan asexual forms pose interesting evolutionary questions. Plasmodium and Toxoplasma genomes encode both a canonical SAS-6, which localizes to the centrosome [30], and a smaller protein of conserved N-terminal called SAS6-like (SAS6L). Canonical SAS6 self-assembles in vitro into geometrically defined structures, and this is thought to template the formation of the centriole cartwheel [50]. Overexpressed SAS6L assembles into filaments in a microtubule-independent fashion [51]. In Toxoplasma tachyzoites, SAS6L localizes to the conoid at the parasite apex, some distance from the juxtanuclear centrioles [51]. Interestingly, the Plasmodium SAS6L homolog is up-regulated in gametocyte development suggesting that it may play a role in basal body assembly in non-coccidian apicomplexans. The conoid also establishes a physical connection with proteins known as striated fiber assemblins (SFAs) [52]. In flagellates, SFAs contribute to the basal body rootlet system which orients the basal bodies relative to other subcellular structures [52, 53]. Apicomplexan SFAs are highly similar to SFA in flagellated algae such as Chlamydomonas [52, 54]. However, apicomplexan SFAs are expressed in the absence of flagella during asexual replication. Apicomplexan cell division occurs by internal assembly of daughter cells within the cytosol or at the surface of the mother cell [7]. These SFA fibers form immediately after centriole duplication and establish a physical link between the duplicated centrioles and the emerging daughter APR and conoid structures [52]. This connection is essential to ensure the proper segregation of genetic material to the emerging daughter cells, as the centrioles remain durably connected to the chromosomes by way of the mitotic spindle throughout cell division [7, 55]. Interestingly, the non-apicomplexan alveolates Colpodella vorax and Rastrimonas subtilis construct pseudoconoids which are somewhat similar to conoids. Unlike in apicomplexans, these organisms build flagella adjacent to an apical pseudoconoid structure. It has been proposed that in adapting to parasitic lifestyles apicomplexans lost their flagella. However, the basal body and the conoid may be linked by historical interdependence. We and others have hypothesized that the non-flagellated forms of apicomplexans may have maintained ancestral basal body accessory structures to aid in organelle inheritance during cell division [51, 52, 56].

Strengths and future of basal body research in Apicomplexa

Basal bodies with associated flagellar axonemes are assembled only during microgamete formation in the sexual stage of the parasite life cycle. The sexual stages of apicomplexans are of great interest to the research community as they are required for generating genetic variation in both T. gondii and Plasmodium. They are also required for transmission of malaria in endemic areas. To date, we know that basal bodies are structurally and compositionally different from their mammalian counterparts. It is likely that their precise composition, organization, and construction are all distinct. However, our molecular insight into these structures remains superficial. Tubulin-based structures have been validated as anti-parasitic targets in T. gondii [30], and blocking transmission in mosquitoes has been proposed as a viable route for malaria prevention [16, 41]. Better understanding of the molecular components and biogenesis of apicomplexan basal bodies and flagellar axonemes is critical to meeting these goals. Obtaining microgametes in vitro is technically challenging, and currently represents the major rate limiting step in the advance of our molecular understanding of these cells. Efficient technology to promote the differentiation of asexual forms into microgametes in vitro or ex vivo could greatly impact our ability to understand differentiation at the structural and molecular level of these important human pathogens. Efforts focusing in developing these technologies should be at the center of Apicomplexa basal body research in the future.

Abbreviations

MTOC: 

microtubule organizing center

CP: 

centriolar plaque

BBS: 

Bardet–Biedl syndrome

IFT: 

intraflagellar transport

EM: 

electron microscopy

APR: 

apical polar rings

SFA: 

striated fiber assembly

SAS6-L: 

SAS6-like

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MEF drafted the manuscript. JFD helped to draft the manuscript. NM helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

M.E.F is funded by an EMBO long-term postdoctoral fellowship.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cell Cycle Regulation Laboratory, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia
(2)
UMR 5235 CNRS, Université de Montpellier 2
(3)
Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California Irvine

References

  1. Adl SM, Simpson AGB, Farmer MA, Andersen RA, Anderson OR, Barta JR, Bowser SS, Brugerolle G, Fensome RA, Fredericq S, et al. The new higher level classification of eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2005;52:399–451.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cavalier-Smith T. Archamoebae: the ancestral eukaryotes? Biosystems. 1991;25:25–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Levine ND, Corliss JO, Cox FE, Deroux G, Grain J, Honigberg BM, Leedale GF, Loeblich AR, Lom J, Lynn D, et al. A newly revised classification of the protozoa. J Protozool. 1980;27:37–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Levine ND. Some corrections of coccidian (Apicomplexa: protozoa) nomenclature. J Parasitol. 1980;66:830–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke-Gaffney HJ. Malaria. Trop Dis Bull. 1964;61:329–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Montoya JG, Liesenfeld O. Toxoplasmosis. Lancet. 2004;363:1965–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Francia ME, Striepen B. Cell division in apicomplexan parasites. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:125–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Morrissette NS, Sibley LD. Cytoskeleton of apicomplexan parasites. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002;66:21–38.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dubremetz JF. Ultrastructural study of schizogonic mitosis in the coccidian, Eimeria necatrix (Johnson 1930). J Ultrastruct Res. 1973;42:354–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubremetz JF. L’ultrastructure du centriole et du centrocone chez la coccidie eimeria necatrix. Étude au cours de la schizogonie. J Microsc. 1971;23:453–8.Google Scholar
  11. Morrissette NS, Sibley LD. Disruption of microtubules uncouples budding and nuclear division in Toxoplasma gondii. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:1017–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sinden RE, Smalley ME. Gametocytogenesis of Plasmodium falciparum in vitro: the cell-cycle. Parasitology. 1979;79:277–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mahajan B, Selvapandiyan A, Gerald NJ, Majam V, Zheng H, Wickramarachchi T, Tiwari J, Fujioka H, Moch JK, Kumar N, et al. Centrins, cell cycle regulation proteins in human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:31871–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sinden RE. Gametocytogenesis of Plasmodium falciparum in vitro: an electron microscopic study. Parasitology. 1982;84:1–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Speer CA, Dubey JP. Ultrastructural differentiation of Toxoplasma gondii schizonts (types B to E) and gamonts in the intestines of cats fed bradyzoites. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35:193–206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sinden RE, Talman A, Marques SR, Wass MN, Sternberg MJE. The flagellum in malarial parasites. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010;13:491–500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pelster B, Piekarski G. Elektronenmikroskopische analyse der mikrogametenentwicklung bei Toxoplasma gondii Z. Parasitenkd. 1971;37:267–77.Google Scholar
  18. Ferguson DJP, Dubremetz J. The ultrastructure of Toxoplasma gondii. In: Toxoplasma Gondii: the model apicomplexan—perspectives and methods. 2nd ed. 2013. p. 19–59Google Scholar
  19. Sinden RE, Canning EU, Spain B. Gametogenesis and fertilization in Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis: a transmission electron microscope study. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1976;193:55–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Morrissette N, Gubbels MJ. The Toxoplasma cytoskeleton. structures, proteins and processes. In: Toxoplasma Gondii: the model apicomplexan—perspectives and methods. 2nd ed.2013. p. 455–503.Google Scholar
  21. Ferguson DJ, Hutchison WM, Dunachie JF, Siim JC. Ultrastructural study of early stages of asexual multiplication and microgametogony of Toxoplasma gondii in the small intestine of the cat. APMIS. 1974;82:167–81.Google Scholar
  22. Mueller BE, Desser SS, Haberkorn A. Ultrastructure of developing gamonts of Eimeria contorta Haberkorn, 1971 (protozoa, sporozoa) with emphasis on the host–parasite interface. J Parasitol. 1981;67:487–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mehlhorn H, Heydorn AO. Electron microscopical study on gamogony of Sarcocystis suihominis in human tissue cultures. Z. Parasitenkd. 1979;58:97–113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Walker RA, Ferguson DJP, Miller C, Smith NC. Sex and eimeria: a molecular perspective. Parasitology. 2013;140:1701–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Scholtyseck E, Mehlhorn H, Hammond DM. Electron microscope studies of microgametogenesis in coccidia and related groups. Z. Parasitenkd. 1972;38:95–131.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Vetterling JM, Pacheco ND, Fayer R. Fine structure of gametogony and oocyst formation in Sarcocystis sp. in cell culture. J. Protozool. 1973;20:613–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Aurrecoechea C, Barreto A, Brestelli J, Brunk BP, Cade S, Doherty R, Fischer S, Gajria B, Gao X, Gingle A, et al. EuPathDB: the eukaryotic pathogen database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D684–91.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nagel SD, Boothroyd JC. The α- and β-tubulins of Toxoplasma gondii are encoded by single copy genes containing multiple introns. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1988;29:261–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Xiao H, El Bissati K, Verdier-Pinard P, Burd B, Zhang H, Kim K, Fiser A, Angeletti RH, Weiss LM. Post-translational modifications to Toxoplasma gondii α- and β-Tubulins include novel C-terminal methylation. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:359–72.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Morrissette N. Targeting toxoplasma tubules: tubulin, microtubules, and associated proteins in a human pathogen. Eukaryot Cell. 2015;14:2–12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Suvorova ES, Francia M, Striepen B, White M. A novel bipartite centrosome coordinates the apicomplexan cell cycle. PLoS Biol. 2015;13:e1002093.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Marshall WF, Rosenbaum JL. Tubulin superfamily: giving birth to triplets. Curr Biol. 2003;13:R55–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Garreau de Loubresse N, Ruiz F, Beisson J, Klotz C. Role of δ-tubulin and the C-tubule in assembly of Paramecium basal bodies. BMC Cell Biol. 2001;2:4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Dupuis-Williams P, Fleury-Aubusson A, De Loubresse NG, Geoffroy H, Vayssié L, Galvani A, Espigat A, Rossier J. Functional role of ε-tubulin in the assembly of the centriolar microtubule scaffold. J Cell Biol. 2002;158:1183–93.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Dutcher SK, Morrissette NS, Preble AM, Rackley C, Stanga J. ε-Tubulin Is an essential component of the centriole. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:3859–69.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ross I, Clarissa C, Giddings TH, Winey M. ε-tubulin is essential in Tetrahymena thermophila for the assembly and stability of basal bodies. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:3441–51.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hu K, Johnson J, Florens L, Fraunholz M, Suravajjala S, DiLullo C, Yates J, Roos DS, Murray JM. Cytoskeletal components of an invasion machine—the apical complex of Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:0121–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Hu K, Roos DS, Murray JM. A novel polymer of tubulin forms the conoid of Toxoplasma gondii. J Cell Biol. 2002;156:1039–50.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Bannister LH, Mitchell GH. The role of the cytoskeleton in Plasmodium falciparum merozoite biology: an electron-microscopic view. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1995;89:105–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sterling CR, Aikawa M. A comparative study of gametocyte ultrastructure in avian Haemosporidia. J. Protozool. 1973;20:81–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Marques SR, Ramakrishnan C, Carzaniga R, Blagborough AM, Delves MJ, Talman AM, Sinden RE. An essential role of the basal body protein SAS-6 in Plasmodium male gamete development and malaria transmission. Cell Microbiol. 2015;17:191–206.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Carvalho-Santos Z, Machado P, Branco P, Tavares-Cadete F, Rodrigues-Martins A, Pereira-Leal JB, Bettencourt-Dias M. Stepwise evolution of the centriole-assembly pathway. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:1414–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Bettencourt-Dias M, Rodrigues-Martins A, Carpenter L, Riparbelli M, Lehmann L, Gatt MK, Carmo N, Balloux F, Callaini G, Glover DM. SAK/PLK4 is required for centriole duplication and flagella development. Curr Biol. 2005;15:2199–207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Chen C-T, Gubbels M-J. The Toxoplasma gondii centrosome is the platform for internal daughter budding as revealed by a Nek1 kinase mutant. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:3344–55.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Young JA, Fivelman QL, Blair PL, De La Vega P, Le Roch KG, Zhou Y, Carucci DJ, Baker DA, Winzeler EA. The Plasmodium falciparum sexual development transcriptome: a microarray analysis using ontology-based pattern identification. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2005;143:67–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Khan SM, Franke-Fayard B, Mair GR, Lasonder E, Janse CJ, Mann M, Waters AP. Proteome analysis of separated male and female gametocytes reveals novel sex-specific Plasmodium biology. Cell. 2005;121:675–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Briggs LJ, Davidge JA, Wickstead B, Ginger ML, Gull K. More than one way to build a flagellum; comparative genomics of parasitic protozoa. Curr Biol. 2004;14:R611–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hodges ME, Scheumann N, Wickstead B, Langdale JA, Gull K. Reconstructing the evolutionary history of the centriole from protein components. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:1407–13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Silflow CD, Lavoie M, Tam LW, Tousey S, Sanders M, Wu WC, Borodovsky M, Lefebvre PA. The Vfl1 protein in Chlamydomonas localizes in a rotationally asymmetric pattern at the distal ends of the basal bodies. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:63–74.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Gopalakrishnan J, Guichard P, Smith AH, Schwarz H, Agard DA, Marco S, Avidor-Reiss T. Self-assembling SAS-6 multimer is a core centriole building block. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:8759–70.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. de Leon JC, Scheumann N, Beatty W, Beck JR, Tran JQ, Yau C, Bradley PJ, Gull K, Wickstead B, Morrissette NS. A sas-6-like protein suggests that the Toxoplasma conoid complex evolved from flagellar components. Eukaryot Cell. 2013;12:1009–19.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Francia ME, Jordan CN, Patel JD, Sheiner L, Demerly JL, Fellows JD, de Leon JC, Morrissette NS, Dubremetz JF, Striepen B. Cell division in apicomplexan parasites is organized by a homolog of the striated rootlet fiber of algal flagella. PLoS Biol. 2012;10(12):e1001444.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Lechtreck K-F, Rostmann J, Grunow A. Analysis of chlamydomonas SF-assemblin by GFP tagging and expression of antisense constructs. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:1511–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Harper JDI, Thuet J, Lechtreck KF, Hardham AR. Proteins related to green algal striated fiber assemblin are present in stramenopiles and alveolates. Protoplasma. 2009;236:97–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Brooks CF, Francia ME, Gissot M, Croken MM, Kim K, Striepen B. Toxoplasma gondii sequesters centromeres to a specific nuclear region throughout the cell cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:3767–72.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Portman N, Šlapeta J. The flagellar contribution to the apical complex: a new tool for the eukaryotic swiss army knife? Trends Parasitol. 2014;30:58–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Francia et al. 2016